A Truly Convservative View of Religious Freedom

Posted on 25 March 2014 by Gay/Lesbian News

Religious freedom as we have known it stands in the balance this week as the United States Supreme Court prepares to hear arguments in the cases of Hobby Lobby v. Sebelius and Conestoga Woods v. Sebelius. We are once again entrusting nine justices in the high court with the responsibility to protect the very nature of religious freedom as defined by the Constitution in this country. I do not believe it is overstating the case to say that ruling in favor of Hobby Lobby will fundamentally alter a definition that has stood for more than two centuries.

Unfortunately, some people in the faith community have taken a shortsighted approach to religious freedom over the last few years in an attempt to turn the First Amendment into an opt-out from any public policy with which they do not agree. This misguided approach has been used as a battering ram against marriage equality, tax law and — in this case — the Affordable Care Act’s contraception mandate.

If the high court adopts the narrow-minded approach of the religious right, the religious and legal landscape will become almost unrecognizable. What happens when the rights traditionally reserved for individuals are extended to corporations? Left up to the religious whims of employers and private individuals, the civil rights advancements for racial and religious minorities, women and the LGBT community will most certainly be eviscerated. Private establishments could be granted the right to refuse service to customers who have been divorced or have had abortions, who commit adultery or fail to live up to a limitless number of potential religious standards. Nearly any business regulation could be challenged on religious grounds, and judges will be forced to make ecclesiastical evaluations or allow our entire legal code to crumble.

Hopefully, the Court will rule for what I consider the more traditional, and dare I say more conservative, view of religious liberty. That decision could prompt a return to a saner debate on these issues. The First Amendment should be understood as it always has been: a guaranteed protection for the rights of religious minorities and unshakable assurance that one’s religion does not define one’s relationship to the government. Gone, I pray, would be attempts to use religion to create a private right to discriminate or the ability to opt out of laws that one finds unsavory. The age of so-called “conscience clauses” and the over-broad religious exemption would finally begin to wane.

The debate at the Supreme Court this week centers on the rights of women to access contraception under the Affordable Care Act. When Congress passed this law they recognized that there was a social, economic and medical good in empowering women to make their own family-planning decisions. To this end, Congress required all employer-sponsored health insurance to cover free access to contraception.

The ACA takes care to exempt houses of worship and to accommodate certain religious organizations, as American law has traditionally done when a determined social good conflicts with some religious traditions. This much is the promise of the First Amendment, that the government cannot force a religious institution to violate its beliefs. That assurance has proven good for government and good for religion. The core question of Hobby Lobby and Conestoga Woods is whether, for the first time in history, this exemption should be expanded to for-profit secular corporations. That is the only question in these cases, and that is the decision that will push us over or draw us back from the ledge.

However, the plaintiffs in this case have been working to shift the focus to a very different question. Steve Green, the president of Hobby Lobby, has taken to the media to explain his side of the story. He discusses his three-decade commitment to his church and to living a Christian life. He emphasizes his philanthropic donations to Christian organizations and causes, and he lauds policies, such as closing on Sundays, which he has implemented in his stores to allow his employees to live a Christian life. While I am sure Mr. Green’s beliefs are sincere and his acts are commendable, they should have no bearing on this case.

Along with many others who respect religious freedom, I will watch anxiously to see if the justices are smart enough to see through this dangerous attempt to redefine one of the foundations of our nation. Despite narrow sectarian pressure, they need to protect religious freedom — not merely for a few, but for all.

Powered by WPeMatico

Share

Comments are closed.

Advertise Here

Photos from our Flickr stream

See all photos

Advertise Here

Ad Squares Widget

Ad Square Ad Square

Ad Squares Widget

Ad Square Ad Square
Share
  • Google Search Gay, Lesbian, BiSexual, TransGender and LGBT 2013
    YouTube Video
    Google Search Gay, Lesbian, BiSexual, TransGender and LGBT 2013
    http://bit.ly/11oRxbA | In celebration of equal rights, the proudly gay-friendly search giant has hidden a fabulous easter egg for users who search "gay." Th...
  • Human rights leaders speak out for LGBT equality
    YouTube Video
    Human rights leaders speak out for LGBT equality
    UN Human Rights Chief Navi Pillay, Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and South Africa's Justice Edwin Cameron speak out for the human rights of lesbian, gay, ...
  • LGBT: The New Civil Rights
    YouTube Video
    LGBT: The New Civil Rights
    Today's civil rights issues are equality and fair treatment for the LGBT -- lesbian, gay, bi-sexual, transgender, community. The CMC forum panel on Feb. 5, m...
  • President Obama's message to the National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change
    YouTube Video
    President Obama's message to the National Conference on LGBT Equality: Creating Change
    President Barack Obama issued a video statement airing today before 3000 lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights advocates assembled for the Na...
  • US Needs Marriage Equality Now Obama Tells LGBT Gathering At White House
    YouTube Video
    US Needs Marriage Equality Now Obama Tells LGBT Gathering At White House
    President Obama told a gathering of Lesbian, Gay, Bi-sexual and Transgendered people at the White House that the US needs marriage equality now. "We're not g...
  • CNN DIALOGUES:  Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender
    YouTube Video
    CNN DIALOGUES: Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender
    Lesbian, Gay, Bi-Sexual, Transgender: Has More Openness Led to More Acceptance? The LGBT community has a long history of participation, activism, and contrib...
  • Kenya: Allow LGBT Rights Groups to Register
    YouTube Video
    Kenya: Allow LGBT Rights Groups to Register
    (Nairobi, October 2, 2014) – Human rights groups, including lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights groups, should be able to register and carr...
  • It's Time - Scotland's equal marriage video  [Equality Network]
    YouTube Video
    It's Time - Scotland's equal marriage video [Equality Network]
    Please share this with friends, family and people you love: http://www.equalmarriage.org.uk/ItsTime Support the Equality Network's Equal Marriage campaign by...
  • Pinoys join the march for LGBT rights in US, UK
    YouTube Video
    Pinoys join the march for LGBT rights in US, UK
    A thousand people marched in various parts of the world to promote the equal rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT). Filipinos joined in the...
  • M.E. 2 for Marriage Equality - LGBT National Youth Council - Craig and Scott
    YouTube Video
    M.E. 2 for Marriage Equality - LGBT National Youth Council - Craig and Scott
    The lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) National Youth Council (NYC), supported by LGBT Youth Scotland represents the views of LGBT young people ac...

RELATED SITES